The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated because of enmity of election of Pradhan. The injured has stated before the police that the role of the present accused was only of exhortation and similarly another injured has also stated that the present accused's role was of exhortation and upon his exhortation, Danish Haidar and Ratnesh had made this attack, which resulted in causing injuries to the injured. It is also stated that Ram Naresh and other villagers have filed affidavits stating that they were attending the 'Tirahvi' of Rajan Singh on that date and accused was also there, hence he was not involved in the occurrence. As regards the criminal history, it is stated by the learned counsel for the applicant that the accused had three cases other than the present case. In Case Crime no. 56 of 2013 under section 302 IPC and Section 3(2)V of SC/ST Act, PS Paschhim Sharira, District Kaushambi, he has been acquitted. The copy of the judgment of the acquittal order has been annexed. In Case Crime no.26 of 2012 under section 147, 148, 323, 504, 506 IPC, PS Mahewa Ghat, District Kaushambi and
