Kuldeep v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40158 of 2016
Applicant :- Kuldeep Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Niklank Kumar Jain,Amit Daga,Rahul Mehrotra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ram Sanehi Yadav
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that witnesses have been examined and the trial of the applicant has been concluded and in view of the above, bail application has become infructuous.
Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 Faridul
Kuldeep
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court