Allowed

Yogender v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC28 Sept 2018BAIL/37212/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application filed by Yogender, who was in judicial custody since 27.07.2018. The applicant argued for bail on the ground of parity as a co-accused, Mahendra, had been released by the same Court on 26.09.2018. The AGA opposed the prayer but could not dispute the fact. The Court held that the case is fit for bail in light of Article 21 and the principles laid down in Dataram Singh v. State of U

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties; conditions include cooperation with trial, no tampering with evidence, no unlawful activities, and no misuse of liberty.

Yogender Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 55

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 37212 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Yogender Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Kakkar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned AGA for the State and perused the material brought on record.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the coaccused Mahendra having similar role has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 26.09.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 36808 of 2018 a copy of said order has been produced by the learned counsel for the applicant, which is taken on record and the case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is in jail since 27.07.2018.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶8

Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any view on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.

¶9

Let applicant Yogender be released on bail in Case Crime No. 1946 of 2018, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 332, 504, 353, 427 IPC, Police Station- Indirapuram, District- Ghaziabad on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

¶10

(i) The applicant will co-operate with the trial and remain present personally on each and every date fixed after release. (ii) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever. (iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities. (iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.

¶11

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶12

Order Date :- 28.9.2018 Arti

Yogender v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogender v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Waseem Vs State of U.P.

Dhanraj Chauhan Vs State of U.P.

Saurabh Dubey Vs State of U.P.

Durgesh Kumar @ Dabboo Vs State of U.P.

Immamuddin Vs State of U.P.

Manoj Nishad Vs State of U.P.