Allowed

ram awadh maurya v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC13 Mar 2018BAIL/3686/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh, J. allowed bail to the applicant in a cheating and forgery case. The court found prima facie satisfaction of charges and applied the reformative theory of punishment, granting release on personal bond with sureties subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicant on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount.

ram awadh maurya Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3686 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Ram Awadh Maurya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Brijmohan Pandey,Arun Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

List revised.

¶6

None appeared on behalf of the complainant.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Poonam Singh Sengar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶8

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the dispute between the parties is purely of civil nature, which has been dragged into criminal criminal prosecution of the applicant. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 19.11.2017. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no criminal history.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶10

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶11

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the

¶12

applicant Ram Awadh Maurya involved in Case Crime No.0151 of 2016, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Soraon, District Allahabad be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.

¶13

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶14

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶15

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶16

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶18

Order Date :- 13.3.2018 Dev/-

ram awadh maurya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

ram awadh maurya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Atul Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Muzaffar and Another Vs State of U.P.

Rajan Yadav @ Sodhan Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Akshay @ Kalu Vs State of U.P.

Gauraw Vs State of U.P.

Harcharan Vs State of U.P.