Allowed

Lalu @ Kariya Kewat @ Surendra Kumar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 Feb 2018BAIL/368/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed bail to the applicant accused of offences under Sections 394, 411, 419, 420, 467, 468, and 471 IPC. The court granted bail based on a prima facie satisfaction of the charge and reformative theory of punishment, imposing conditions including a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on personal bond with two sureties of equivalent amount.

Lalu @ Kariya Kewat @ Surendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 368 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Lalu @ Kariya Kewat @ Surendra Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shyam Sunder Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the applicant is taken

¶6

Heard Sri Shyam Sunder Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ravi Singh Parihar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶7

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the applicant was not named in the first information report nor anything has been recovered from his possession or on his pointing out. It is further submitted that the name of the applicant has come into light in the confessional statement of the co-accused Vinod. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 27.9.2017. It has been pointed out that the applicant has criminal history, which has been explained in para 3 of the supplementary affidavit which is on record,

¶8

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶9

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶10

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Lalu @ Kariya Kewat @ Surendra Kumar involved in Case Crime No.123 of 2017, under Sections 394, 411, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Aung, District Fatehour be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.

¶11

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶12

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶13

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶14

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 8.2.2018 Dev/-

Lalu @ Kariya Kewat @ Surendra Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalu @ Kariya Kewat @ Surendra Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Kumar Patel Vs State of U.P.

Suraj Chaubey Vs State of U.P.

Ravender Vs State of U.P.

Raja Vs State of U.P.

Atif @ Ranu Vs State of U.P.

Rakesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.