Allowed

Intezar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC18 Sept 2018BAIL/35256/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Bail Application allowed to Intezar, accused under Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Acts. Court held it is a fit case for bail due to false recovery and lack of evidence despite opposition by State.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail by furnishing personal bond and two sureties, subject to five conditions including non-tampering with evidence and appearing before the trial court.

Intezar Vs State of U.P. — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 41 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35256 of 2018 Applicant :- Intezar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sayeed Saif Ullah,Sufia Saba Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶4

According to the prosecution case, F.I.R. was lodged against four accused persons namely, Shakeel, Mosin, Munavvar and Intejar alleging that on 13.2.2018, 100 Kg. beef and some instruments for slaughtering were recovered from the place of occurrence and all accused persons fled away.

¶5

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that recovery is false and planted. There is no evidence to connect the applicant with the present matter. Applicant was not arrested on the spot. There is no independent witness against the applicant. Nothing was recovered from the possession of applicant. The applicant is innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 24.2.2018 (more than seven and half months) criminal history of two cases has been properly explained and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶6

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that criminal history has been explained.

¶7

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.

¶8

Let the applicant Intezar involved in Case Crime No. 25 of 2018, under Section 3/5A/8 Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and 11/5 Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, P.S. Mirzapur, District Saharanpur be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:

¶9

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶10

The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶11

The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶12

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶13

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶15

Order Date :- 18.9.2018//A. Singh

Intezar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Intezar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meharban Vs State of U.P.

Pramod Kumar and Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ravi Vs State of U.P.

Majid Vs State of U.P.

Ayyub Vs State of U.P.

Laltesh Vs State of U.P.