Allowed

Radheyshyam v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC13 Sept 2018BAIL/34677/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code regarding unlawful assembly and intimidation, the High Court of Uttar Pradesh granted bail to the applicant on the ground of parity with co-accused who were already released, subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Radheyshyam Vs State of U.P. — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 55

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34677 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Radheyshyam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Safiullah Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that similarly placed co-accused namely, Indrapal and Vishnu have already been enlarged on bail by this Court by order dated 6.9.2018 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 33863 of 2018, copy of bail order produced by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. He further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused Indrapal and Vishnu who have already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.

¶7

The prayer for bail has vehemently been opposed by learned A.G.A.

¶8

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A., this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for grant of bail on the ground of parity.

¶9

In view of the above, let the applicant, Radheyshyam be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in Case Crime No. 287 of 2018, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 308, 34, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Gunnor, district-Sambhal with the following conditions :-

¶10

(i) The applicant will co-operate with the trail and remain

¶11

present personally on each and every date fixed after release. (ii) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever. (iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities. (iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.

¶12

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶13

Order Date :- 13.9.2018 Faridul

Radheyshyam v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radheyshyam v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhurey Vs State of U.P.

Chintu @ Chetan Vs State of U.P.

Randheera and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Nazeer Ahmad Alias Raju Vs State of U.P.

Gopal Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Shan Vs State of U.P.