Allowed

pawnesh pandey alias inspector v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC31 Jan 2018BAIL/3439/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3439 of 2018, the Court granted bail to the applicant, Pawnesh Pandey Alias Inspector, citing parity with coaccused who had been released. The prayer was allowed subject to personal bond with sureties and standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing personal bonds with two sureties each, subject to conditions of not tampering with evidence or witnesses and appearing before the trial court.

pawnesh pandey alias inspector Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3439 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Pawnesh Pandey Alias Inspector Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Devendra Kumar,Dharmendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ravi Singh Parihar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the coaccused Praveen Kumar @ C.O. and Bramha Singh @ Ram Babu have been granted bail by another Bench of this Court as well as by this Court on 21.12.2017 and 9.1.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.50547 of 2017 and 764 of 2018, a copy of said order has been produced by the learned counsel for the applicant, which is taken on record and the case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 25.8.2017.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail, but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Pawnesh Pandey Alias Inspector involved in Case Crime No.0747 of 2017, under Sections 395, 504, 411 I.P.C. Police Station Handia, District Allahabad be released on bail on his furnishing personal bonds with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶10

(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶11

(ii) The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶12

(iii) The applicant will appear before the trial Court on the date fixed.

¶13

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶15

Order Date :- 31.1.2018

¶16

Dev/-

pawnesh pandey alias inspector v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

pawnesh pandey alias inspector v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ikram Vs State of U.P.

vijay kumar @ telhu Vs State of U.P.

sameer Vs State of U.P.

mohammad junaid Vs State of U.P.

Uma Shankar Vs State of U.P.

Harpal Yadav Vs State of U.P.