Bunty v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court allowed a bail application for the accused under the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities Act. The applicant claimed illness and employment-induced absence. Bail was granted subject to a personal bond and two sureties.
What did the court decide?
Released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.
What the court decided
Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33991 of 2018
Applicant :- Bunty Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Puneet Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
Initially the accused was on bail and due to his absence, N.B.W. was issued on 11.7.2012 and he was arrested by the police on 23.8.2017 till then he is languishing in jail (more than one year and half months).
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant went to Delhi for employment and was seriously ill due to which he could not appear before the Court; he is a poor person; the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case; in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial. One more opportunity be granted to the applicant.
Learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the bail application is allowed.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant who is a poor person suffering from illness and was absent due to employment in Delhi.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bunty
Coram
Aniruddha Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/33991/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court