It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the alleged incident is said to have taken place on 31.3.2018 and first information report regarding the same has been lodged on 3.4.2018 for which no plausible explanation has been given by the prosecution, which itself falsify the prosecution story. Learned counsel for the applicant has next drawn the attention of this Court towards annexure-3 to the affidavit accompanying this bail application, which is the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., wherein the victim has stated that she had gone with the victim out of her own free will. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 5.5.2018. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no criminal history.
