Allowed

Dhirendra Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC15 Mar 2018BAIL/32037/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court examined the validity of an order dismissing the petitioner from the caste and expelling joint owners from property. The petitioner, allotted a joint property (iros) by the first ward, was expelled by that ward extrajudicially. The court found the expulsion arbitrary, disregarding joint ownership and prior conduct. It validated the petitioner's caste status and expelled her from the com

What did the court decide?

Petitioner expunged from the complainant's caste (Tekur), her status within the petitioner's own caste restored, and she ordered to follow Overtone Pending proceedings as per Hindu Joint Family Rules.

Dhirendra Kumar Sharma Vs State of U.P. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

U;k;d{k l a0 56

¶2

n.M izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuki= la0 32037 lu~ 2017

¶3

/khjsUnz dqekj 'kekZ cuke~ jkT;

¶4

ekuuh; U;k;ewfrZ 'kf'kdkUr

¶5

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh vkbZ0 ds prqosZnh rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls mifLFkr Jh tQhj vgen] fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks tekur izkFkZuki= ij lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶6

orZeku tekur izkFkZuki= eqdnek vijk/k la0 910 lu~ 2016] vUrxZr /kkjk 419] 420] 467] 468] 471] 506] 406 Hkk0na0la0] Fkkuk & uSuh] tiun & bykgkckn esa vfHk;qDr /khjsUnz dqekj 'kekZ dks tekur ij fjgk fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ dks iz'uxr ekeys esa xyr o QthZ rjhds ls Qalk;k x;k gS] izkFkhZ us dksbZ vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gSA ekeys ds okLrfor rF; ;g gS fd izFke lwpuknkrk viuh iq=h dkty dk fookg izkFkhZ ds iq= foosd ls djuk pkgrh Fkh] bl lacU/k esa ojh{kk dh jLe Hkh vnk gks pqdh Fkh ijUrq ckn esa lg Kkr gksus ij fd izFke lwpuknkrk ,d ykyph fdLe dh efgyk gS] izkFkhZ us vius iq= dk mldh iq=h ds lkFkk fookg lEcU/k djus ls euk dj fn;k] ftlls {kqC/k gksdj izFkelwpuk nkrk us ;g QthZ eqdnek izkFkhZ ds fo:) ntZ dj fn;k gSA izkFkhZ us fnukad 28-07-2017 ¼layXud 15½ dks ofj"B iqfyl v/kh{kd] bykgkckn dks bl vk'k; dk ,d izkFkZuki= izLrqr fd;k Fkk fd izFke lwpuknkrk }kjk ikFkhZ dks QthZ eqdnesa esa Qalkus ds vijk/k esa mlds fo:) dk;Zokgh dh tk;A mlds rnUrj izkFkhZ ij nokc cukus gsrq izFke lwpuk nkrk us vkjksi yxk;k fd izkFkhZ us mlds iq= dh jsyos esa ukSdjh fnykus gsrq mlls :i;s 6 yk[k fy;s gSa ijUrq izFke lwpuknkrk us vius izfr'kiFk i= esa blh /kujkf'k dks :i;s 3 yk[k n'kkZ;k gSA izFkelwpuknkrk us izkFkhZ dks mldk nwj dk fj'rsnkj crk;k gSA ukfer xokg eukst dqekj fo'odekZ us vius 161 na0iz0la0 ds c;ku esa ?kVuk dks pkj o"kZ iwoZ dk crk;k gS tks ?kVuk ds le;

¶8

ds fcUnq ij vfHk;kstu dFkkud dk leFkZu ugha djrk gS nwljs ukfer xokg v'ouh dqekj fo'odekZ tks izFke lwpuknkrk dh cgu dk iq= gS dk c;ku vafdr ugha fd;k gSA izkFkhZ dks dksbZ iwoZ vijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gSA mijksDr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ ds fo:) ;ksftr eqdnek iw.kZ :i ls QthZ fl) gksrk gS] izkFkhZ fnukad 05-08-2017 ls tsy esa fu:) gS] rFkk og tekur ij eqDr fd;s tkus gsrq vgZ gSA vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur ij NksMk tkuk U;k;ksfpr gksxkA tekur ij NksM+s tkus ds mijkUr izkFkhZ tekur dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxkA izkFkhZ us vius dFku ds leFkZu esa Jherh xksik pdzorhZ cuke~ mRrj izns'k jkT;] 2007 ¼9½ ,0Mh0ts0 309 ] esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k dks izLrqr fd;k gSA

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us izkFkhZ ds tekur izkFkZuki= dk fojks/k fd;k gS] ijUrq ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd izFke lwpuknkrk ds xokg v'ouh dqekj fo'odekZ dk c;ku vafdr ugha fd;k x;k gS rFkk izkFkhZ dk dksbZ iwoZ vijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gSA

¶10

mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k }kjk izLrqr mijksDr rdksZa] eqdnesa ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; o lkexzh ds le;d~ ifj’khyu ds mijkUr esjs fopkj ls pw¡fd izFke lwpuk nkrk }kjk izkFkhZ dks nh xbZ /kujkf/k ds vadu esa izkFkfedh rFkk mlds }kjk izLrqr izfr'kiFki= esa fHkUurk gS rFkk izkFkhZ dk dksbZ iwoZ vijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gS] vr% U;k;fgr esa izkFkhZ dks Hkh tekur ij NksM+k tkuk U;k;ksfpr gksxkA

¶11

vr% izkFkhZ /khjsUnz dqekj 'kekZ ] tks eqdnek vijk/k la0 910 lu~ 2016] vUrxZr /kkjk 419] 420] 467] 468] 471] 506] 406 Hkk0na0la0] Fkkuk & uSuh] tiun & bykgkckn esa vksjksfir gS] dks muds futh eqpyds rFkk voj U;k;ky; }kjk fu/kkZfjr leku /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij tekur ij fjgk djus dk vkns’k ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA izkFkhZ dh tekur ij fjgkbZ fuEufyf[kr 'krksaZ ds v/khu gksxh %&

¶12

1- izkFkhZ xokgksa dks izHkkfor djus rFkk lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM+&NkM+ djus dk iz;kl ugha djsxkA

¶13

2- izkFkhZ tekur dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxkA

¶14

3- izkFkhZ eqdnesa ds 'kh?kz fuLrkj.k esa iw.kZ lg;ksx djsxk rFkk eqdnesa esa vuko';d LFkxu ugha ysxkA

¶15

4- izkFkhZ fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k leLr fu;r frfFk;ksa ij mifFkr jgsxkA

¶16

mijksDr of.kZr fdlh Hkh 'krZ dk mYya?ku djus ij foi{kh izkFkhZ dh tekur dks fujLr djus gsrq zikFkZuki= izLrqr djus gsrq Lora= gksxkA vkns'k fnukad 15-03-2018 ,0oekZ

Dhirendra Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhirendra Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajab Singh Vs State of U.P.

Shoaib Vs State of U.P.

Deepak Vs State of U.P.

Asif and Another Vs State of U.P.

Pintu Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Mohd Arif Vs State of U.P.