Rambahadur v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court granted bail to applicant Rambahadur in a case under Sections 354 B IPC and POCSO Act, subject to personal bond, two sureties, and standard conditions against tampering or fleeing.
What did the court decide?
Release on bail with personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions.
What the court decided
Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31840 of 2018
Applicant :- Rambahadur Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sheel Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.
Heard Sri Sheel Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned AGA for the State and perused the material brought on record.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. The applicant is 60 years old and is also physically handicapped. It is further contended that statement of victim Asha-PW-2 has been recorded by the court below in which she has denied the incident. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. Further submission is that applicant who is in jail since 15.5.2018 has no other criminal history and there is also no possibility of his either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Applicant also undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant who contends innocence and alleges physical handicap.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rambahadur
Coram
Vivek Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/31840/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court