Allowed

rizwan mansoori @ langara v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC15 Mar 2018BAIL/3092/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to Rizwan Mansoori in a criminal case involving Sections 392 and 411 IPC. The court found prima facie satisfaction regarding the charges despite allegations of false implication and released the applicant on a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each.

rizwan mansoori @ langara Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3092 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Rizwan Mansoori @ Langara Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Girish Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Girish Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri M.R. Khan, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case showing false recovery of a chain of yellow colour from the possession of the applicant. There is no independent witness of the said recovery. In fact no such recovery was made either from the possession of the applicant or on his pointing out. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 21.8.2017. It has been pointed out that the applicant has criminal history which has been duly explained in paragraph no.13 of the affidavit accompanying the bail application.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Rizwan Mansoori @ Langara involved in Case Crime No.291 of 2017, under Sections 392/411 I.P.C., Police Station Barra, District Kanpur Nagar be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.

¶10

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶11

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶12

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶13

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶15

Order Date :- 15.3.2018 Dev/-

rizwan mansoori @ langara v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

rizwan mansoori @ langara v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Vs State of U.P.

Omkar Vs State of U.P.

Jai Narain Bind Vs State of U.P.

Shahid Alias Chhati Fata Vs State of U.P.

Zarrar Ahmad Naqi Vs State of U.P.

Rohit Vs State of U.P.