Allowed

Ram Babu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC16 Aug 2018BAIL/30718/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted bail to the applicant, Ram Babu, involved in a criminal case alleging assault with firearms. The court balanced the severity of charges against the simple nature of injuries, lack of criminal history, and risk of witness tampering, imposing standard bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like amount, subject to conditions regarding cooperation, non-tampering with witnesses, and no illegal activities.

Ram Babu Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 55

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30718 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Ram Babu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the first information report was lodged after twenty four hours of the incident without any plausible explanation. In the said F.I.R. general allegation of assaulting the victim with fire arms has been made against four persons including applicant. He next submitted that the medical report of the injured shows that the injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature and the cause of injury could not be ascertained. He lastly submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 3.4.2018.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the

¶9

witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶10

Let the applicant Ram Babu involved in Case Crime No. 43 of 2018, under Sections 307, 504 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Sidhpura, district-Kasganj be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.

¶11

The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶12

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶13

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶14

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 16.8.2018 Faridul

Ram Babu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Babu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satyendra Gudia Vs State of U.P.

Deepanshu Vs State of U.P.

Dharamveer Vs State of U.P.

Bilal Vs State of U.P.

Mubarak Ali Vs State of U.P.

Shoeb Vs State of U.P.