Allowed

Vinod Kumar @Guddu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC1 Aug 2018BAIL/28886/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed bail to the applicant Vinod Kumar involved in a crime under Sections 420, 506 IPC and Parts VI and VII of IT Act, directing him to furnish a personal bond and two sureties subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

The applicant Vinod Kumar be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court.

Vinod Kumar @Guddu Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28886 of 2018 Applicant :- Vinod Kumar @Guddu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Priyanka Devi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶4

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Vinod Kumar @Guddu with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 45 of 2016, under Sections 420, 506 IPC and 66/67 of IT Act, Police Station Charkhari, District- Mahoba, during pendency of trial.

¶5

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the first information report. His name has come into light during the investigation. The applicant is languishing in jail since 23.6.2018. He does not have any criminal history to his credit. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶6

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.

¶7

Having considered the submissions of the parties and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant Vinod Kumar @Guddu involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶8

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶9

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶10

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶11

In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶12

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶13

Order Date :- 1.8.2018 Ruchi Agrahari

Vinod Kumar @Guddu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar @Guddu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahipal Singh Vs State of U.P.

Vinod Gaur Vs State of U.P.

Ansarullah Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Nadeem Vs State of U.P.

Ankush Vs State of U.P.

Atul Shukla Vs State of U.P.