Disposed

Rakesh Raikwar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC27 Jul 2018BAIL/28091/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Siddharth, J. granted bail to Rakesh Raikwar in Case Crime No. 87 of 2018. The applicant, uncharged in the FIR but recovered with stolen money and a mobile, posted a personal bond with two sureties subject to conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and further crimes.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail in Case Crime No. 87 of 2018, Sections 392, 411 IPC, on furnishing personal bond with two sureties.

Rakesh Raikwar Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28091 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Rakesh Raikwar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Jeet Singh,Ran Jeet Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The argument of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is not named in the First Information Report. Later recovery of Rs. 110/- and one mobile is shown to have been made from the applicant. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit and is in jail since 11.6.2018.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶8

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶9

Let the applicant Rakesh Raikwar be released on bail in Case Crime No. 87 of 2018, under Sections 392, 411 IPC, P.S. Baruwa Sagar, District Jhansi on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice :-

¶10

1.The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

2.The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

3.The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶13

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶14

Order Date :- 27.7.2018 Rk

Rakesh Raikwar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Raikwar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Lal Kol Vs State of U.P.

Sangram Mishra @ Sushil Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Prafull Sarkar Vs State of U.P.

Nirdesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Suresh @ Kalu Vs State of U.P.

Asfaq and Another Vs State of U.P.