Allowed

Suresh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC26 Jul 2018BAIL/27826/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Bail Application by Suresh seeking release on bail in a case under IPC Sections 399, 401. Court granted bail with personal bond and two sureties, imposing standard conditions on tampering with witnesses and commission of further crimes.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions regarding witness tampering and future conduct.

Suresh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 45

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27826 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Suresh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Kumar Mishra,Rajiv Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused Mukesh has already been granted bail by this Court on 25.7.2018 vide Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.27683 of 2018 and the applicant is entitled to parity since the role of the applicant and the coaccused, who has been enlarged on bail, is similar. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 12.6.2018.

¶7

On the other hand learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶9

Let the applicant Suresh be released on bail in Case Crime No. 815 of 2018, under Sections 399, 401, I.P.C, Police Station Vrindavan, District Mathura on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice :-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity

¶13

or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶15

Order Date :- 26.7.2018 T. Sinha

Suresh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kailash Thakur Vs State of U.P.

Ramakant and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Mumtaz Shah Vs State of U.P.

Pran Nath Shukla @ Rakesh Shukla Vs State of U.P.

Kallu Sonkar Vs State of U.P.

Nanhey Vs State of U.P.