Submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the prosecutrix has falsely implicated the applicant in the present case. The applicant belongs to the family of the prosecutrix and in relation he happens to be her grandfather. It is pointed out that there is a property dispute pending between the parties. It is further pointed out that the prosecution version that at the instance of applicant's wife and one other lady, the prosecutrix was sent along with the applicant and while they were going in a train, the applicant is said to have committed rape on her. It is argued that the prosecution version of rape in a train is highly improbable. The medical report does not support the prosecution version of rape. Lastly, it is submitted that the applicant is aged about 50 years, having grown up children and therefore, it is unbelievable that he would commit rape on his grand-daughter. There is no early prospect of conclusion of trial. So, the applicant, who is in jail since 24.03.2018, having no criminal history to his credit, deserves to be released on bail.
