Kallu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
CrM Bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the trial was concluded and the applicant had already been convicted, making the petition devoid of purpose.
What did the court decide?
No relief granted as the application was held infructuous.
What the court decided
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2546 of 2015
Applicant :- Kallu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Dubey,Brij Raj Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
List is revised. No one is present on behalf of the applicant.
Learned A.G.A. states that the trial of present case has been concluded and the accused-applicant has been convicted. In support of the said fact he has filed an affidavit, which is taken on record and in view of the above, writ petition has become infructuous.
Having regard to the submission made by the learned A.G.A., the bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.1.2018 Faridul
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kallu
Coram
Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/2546/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court