Allowed

Ghanshyam Singh Bhadauriya v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC27 Aug 2018BAIL/25080/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Bail Application wherein the court granted bail to the applicant based on parity with coaccused and principles of Article 21, subject to standard conditions and furnishing of bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, non-tampering, and no unlawful activities.

Ghanshyam Singh Bhadauriya Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 55

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25080 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Ghanshyam Singh Bhadauriya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Surat Patel Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Ram Surat Patel, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned AGA for the State and perused the material brought on record.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the coaccused Mustaque @ Mustkeem, Rafeeque and Bharat Singh having similar role have been granted bail by this Court vide orders dated 01.08.2018, 30.07.2018 and 20.07.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 28870 of 2018, 28230 of 2018 and 27157 of 2018, a copy of said orders have been produced by the learned counsel for the applicant, which are taken on record and the case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is in jail since 18.05.2018.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶8

Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any view on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.

¶9

Let applicant Ghanshyam Singh Bhadauriya be released on bail in Case Crime No. 71 of 2018, under Sections 399, 402, 307 IPC, Police StationNadigaon, District- Jalaun on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

¶10

(i) The applicant will co-operate with the trail and remain present personally on each and every date fixed after release. (ii) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever. (iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities. (iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.

¶11

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶12

Order Date :- 27.8.2018 Arti

Ghanshyam Singh Bhadauriya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ghanshyam Singh Bhadauriya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Durgesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Others

Pinku Singh Vs State of U.P.

Madan Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Hari Pal Singh Vs State of U.P.

Ankush Vs State of U.P.

Jai Prakash and Another Vs State of U.P.