Allowed

Ravindra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC18 Jun 2018BAIL/22301/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to the applicant Ravindra in a criminal case under Sections 8/22 of the NDPS Act involving 1 kg of naseela powder recovery, despite lack of chemical report. The court imposed sureties and conditions while expressing no opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with personal bond and two sureties subject to verifying proof and complying with specific behavioral conditions.

Ravindra Vs State of U.P. — Narcotics (NDPS) | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 33

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22301 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Ravindra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Goyal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the applicant which is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that recovery of 1 k.g. naseela powder has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. No report of chemical examination has been received. It is also argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present crime with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and victimize him. The applicant is in jail since 7.05.2018. In case the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶7

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage who is involved in supplying contraband, therefore, the applicant does not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activity.

¶8

Without expressing any opinion on the merits, let the applicant Ravindra involved in case crime No. 510 of 2018 under Section 8/22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, P.S. Jagdishpura,District Agra be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶9

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶10

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶11

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶12

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court

¶13

concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 18.6.2018 Pratima

Ravindra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kailash Patel Vs State of U.P. and Another

Yogendra Pd. Vs Ganga Pd.

Smt. Bismillah Bibi and Others Vs Abdul Moid

Smt. Hemi Vs State of U.P.

Mahesh Vs State of U.P.

Shravan Kumar Pal Vs State of U.P.