Allowed

Smt. Fulwa v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC28 Nov 2018BAIL/19017/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court enlarged the applicant, Smt. Fulwa, on bail in a criminal case involving allegations of supplying poisonous wine causing death. The Court noted identically placed co-accused had already been released and ordered release with standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, subject to five specified conditions prohibiting tampering, harassment, and re-offending.

Smt. Fulwa Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 50

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19017 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Smt. Fulwa Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Kant Bharadwaj,Dheeraj Kumar Pandey,Rajendra Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

According to the prosecution case the F.I.R. was lodged against Fulwa alleging that on 12.3.2018 deceased Avnesh and Sandeep died by drinking poisonous wine supplied by accused Fulwa.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is lady. There is no independent witness against the applicant. There is no chemical examination report to show that recovered wine was adulterated. On the basis of suspicion only, F.I.R. was lodge. After thought, the false story was developed with legal consultation due to previous enmity. In case she is released on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial; she is languishing in jail since 16.3.2018 (near about eight and half months) having no previous criminal history, one case roped after this incident.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail and admitted that applicant has no previous criminal history.

¶9

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and the fact that identically placed co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is deemed fit to enlarge the applicant on bail.

¶10

Let the applicant Smt. Fulwa involved in the Case Crime No. 171 of 2018, under Sections 304, 328 I.P.C., P.S. Khoda, District Ghaziabad be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶11

i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶12

ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses.

¶13

iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court.

¶14

iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission, of which applicant is suspected.

¶15

v) The applicant shall not directly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade the applicant from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 28.11.2018 A. Singh

Smt. Fulwa v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Fulwa v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niranjan Vs State of U.P.

Girdhari Vs State of U.P.

Rajesh Kushwaha Alias Rakesh Kushwaha Vs State of U.P.

Deepak Chauhan Vs State of U.P.

Dharmsheela Vs State of U.P.

Siraz Ali Vs State of Up