Dismissed
Mukesh v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/19001/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19001 of 2014
Applicant :- Mukesh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Chandra Yadav,Ashok Kumar Singh,R.K. Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,K.K. S. Chauhan
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.
Heard Sri Ram Chandra Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ashish Pandey, learned AGA for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the trial in the present case has already been concluded, hence, the present bail application has become infructuous.
The bail application is accordingly rejected as infructuous.
Order Date :- 13.4.2018 A.K.Srivastava
Mukesh
Ramesh Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court