Yusuf v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Misc. Bail Application where the applicant sought release on bail alleging false implication and lack of corroborating eyewitness testimony in a cheating case.
What did the court decide?
Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with conditions.
What the court decided
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1564 of 2018
Applicant :- Yusuf Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Ali Imam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Syed Ali Imam, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Poonam Singh Sengar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that there was no independent eyewitness, who could corroborate the recovery. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been place forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 10.07.2017. The applicant has no other reported criminal antecedent.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to be released on bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. given the nature of accusation and evidence.
Whether the ground of false implication and lack of corroboration by independent eyewitness warrants bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Yusuf
Coram
Vivek Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/1564/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court