Allowed

Naresh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC24 Apr 2018BAIL/14913/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the applicant in a rape and assault trial. The order noted contradictions in the victim's statements regarding the actual assailants. Bail was granted subject to specific conditions regarding trial attendance and a speedy trial.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with a personal bond and two sureties on conditions of attendance at trial dates and ensuring a speedy trial.

Naresh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 54

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14913 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Naresh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Satya Prakash Rathor,Satya Prakash Rathor Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶6

By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in case crime no.68 of 2018, under Sections 452, 354(Ka), 376 IPC, Police Station Kulpahar, District- Mahoba is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his application for bail submits that the applicant is innocent. It is further submitted that the victim is major and married woman, the FIR was registered by her husband on the same day for the offences under Sections 354(Ka) and 452 IPC against the applicant and one Rampal. In her statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C., the victim has levelled the allegations of only misbehaving while in her statement recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C. after 7 days i.e. on 12.03.2018, she has attributed the role of committing rape upon her by Rampal and one Mahesh and again in her statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C. recorded on 20.03.2018, she has stated that it was in fact Naresh, but in confusion she has taken the name of Mahesh. It is next submitted that the applicant is in jail since 05.03.2018 having no criminal antecedents except the present one.

¶8

Learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts and the legal submissions as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

Keeping in view the contradiction in the statements of the victim recorded u/s 161 & 164 Cr.P.C. shifting allegations from Mahesh to Naresh (applicant), nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.

¶10

Let the applicant, Naresh , involved in case crime no.68 of 2018, under Sections 452, 354(Ka), 376 IPC, Police Station Kulpahar, District- Mahoba be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶11

(i) THE APPLICANT SHALL FILE AN UNDERTAKING TO THE EFFECT THAT HE/SHE SHALL NOT SEEK ANY ADJOURNMENT ON THE DATE FIXED FOR EVIDENCE

¶12

WHEN THE WITNESSES ARE PRESENT IN COURT. IN CASE OF DEFAULT OF THIS CONDITION, IT SHALL BE OPEN FOR THE TRIAL COURT TO TREAT IT AS ABUSE OF LIBERTY OF BAIL AND PASS ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

¶13

(ii) THE APPLICANT SHALL REMAIN PRESENT BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT ON EACH DATE FIXED, EITHER PERSONALLY OR THROUGH HIS/HER COUNSEL. IN CASE OF HIS/HER ABSENCE, WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE, THE TRIAL COURT MAY PROCEED AGAINST HIM/HER UNDER SECTION 229-A IPC.

¶14

(iii) IN CASE, THE APPLICANT MISUSES THE LIBERTY OF BAIL DURING TRIAL AND IN ORDER TO SECURE HIS/HER PRESENCE PROCLAMATION UNDER SECTION 82 CR.P.C., MAY BE ISSUED AND IF APPLICANT FAILS TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COURT ON THE DATE FIXED IN SUCH PROCLAMATION, THEN, THE TRIAL COURT SHALL INITIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST HIM/HER, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, UNDER SECTION 174-A IPC.

¶15

(iv) THE APPLICANT SHALL REMAIN PRESENT, IN PERSON, BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT ON DATES FIXED FOR (1) OPENING OF THE CASE, (2) FRAMING OF CHARGE AND (3) RECORDING OF STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 313 CR.P.C. IF IN THE OPINION OF THE TRIAL COURT ABSENCE OF THE APPLICANT IS DELIBERATE OR WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE, THEN IT SHALL BE OPEN FOR THE TRIAL COURT TO TREAT SUCH DEFAULT AS ABUSE OF LIBERTY OF BAIL AND PROCEED AGAINST THE HIM/HER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

¶16

(v) THE TRIAL COURT MAY MAKE ALL POSSIBLE EFFORTS/ENDEAVOUR AND TRY TO CONCLUDE THE TRIAL WITHIN A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER THE RELEASE OF THE APPLICANT.

¶17

However, it is made clear that any willful violation of above conditions by the applicant, shall have serious repercussion on his/her bail so granted by this court and the trial court is at liberty to cancel the bail, after recording the reasons for doing so, in the given case of any of the condition mentioned above. Order Date :- 24.4.2018 Anoop

Naresh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Vs State of U.P.

Ajju @ Ajay Vs State of U.P.

Santosh Kumar Dubey Vs State of U.P.

Tinkoo @Manjesh Vs State of U.P.

Rahul Jaishwal Vs State of U.P.

Rahul Vs State of U.P.