Allowed

Dau Ji v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC13 Apr 2018BAIL/13738/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the applicant, Dau Ji, in a charge of robbery and criminal intimidation. The court relied on parity with a co-accused and the absence of flight risk, imposing strict conditions regarding court attendance and misuse of bail.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicant on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties subject to specific strict conditions.

Dau Ji Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 23

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13738 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Dau Ji Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Gautam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Mrs. Rekha Dikshit,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that accused applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the case of the applicant is identical to the case of co-accused Gopal Sharma, who has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 03.04.2018, therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 19.01.2018. It is next submitted that the applicant has criminal history of six cases, out of which in five cases, he is on bail and one case is pending before this Court. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from judicial custody or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶8

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶9

Let the applicant, namely, Dau Ji involved in Case Crime No.587 of 2017, under Sections 392, 506, 411 IPC, Police Station Hathras Junction, District Hathras be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶10

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶11

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in

¶13

order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

Order Date :- 13.4.2018 Anupam S/-

Dau Ji v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dau Ji v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhash Vs State of U.P.

Smt Shabana Vs State of U.P.

Dharam Pal Singh Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Lokendra Singh Vs State of U.P.

Bharat Kumar Rai Vs State of U.P.

Dau Ji Vs State of U.P.