Satto v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court considered bail application in a rape and criminal intimidation case. Granted bail subject to strict conditions regarding attendance, evidence dates, and consequences of default including arrest summons.
What did the court decide?
Released on bail on personal bond and two sureties subject to strict conditions of attendance and no abuse of liberty.
What the court decided
Court No. - 54
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13161 of 2018
Applicant :- Satto Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Garun Pal Singh,Vikas Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant, is taken on record.
Sri Pankaj Sharma, Advocate has filed his parcha on behalf of the complainant, is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in case crime no. 66 of 2017, under Sections 376, 506 IPC, P.S. Barsana, DistrictMathura is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.
Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his application for bail submits that the applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated. It is further submitted that the FIR was registered through 156(3) application. The prosecutrix is a married woman aged about 30-32 years. In her statement recorded u/s 161 Cr.P.C. the prosecutrix stated that she has not admitted for medical examination. The incident was seen by one Shankar, who happens to be the Jeth of the prosecutrix, a highly interested witness. Her statement recorded u/s 161 Cr.P.C. does not generating any confidence. It is next submitted that the applicant is in jail since 27.07.2017 having no criminal antecedents except the present one.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to enlargement on bail during the pendency of the trial in a case involving Sections 376 and 506 IPC.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Satto
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Rahul Chaturvedi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/13161/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court