Ashok Ram v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed a bail application under the U.P. Gangsters Act finding the applicant a fit case for bail as no evidence of violence or disturbance of public order was present.
What did the court decide?
Release on bail with a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount.
What the court decided
Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11222 of 2018
Applicant :- Ashok Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raghawendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard Sri Raghawendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Ashok Ram, who is involved in Case Crime No. 548 of 2017, under Section 2/3 (1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Police Station - Dokati, District – Ballia.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. There are two cases shown in the gang chart at Case Crime No. 205 of 2016 and 34 of 2013 in which he is on bail. Copy of bail orders have been annexed at Annexure No. 3 and 4, respectively of the affidavit appended to the bail application. The applicant has no other criminal history. He undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty of bail, if the same is granted to him. The applicant is languishing in jail since 29.01.2018.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is a fit case for enlargement on bail under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ashok Ram
Coram
Umesh Chandra Tripathi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/11222/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court