Pappu @ Vikaruddin v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application filed by Pappu @ Vikaruddin challenging false implication. The court, without expressing opinion on merits, granted bail due to severity of charge and other factors, subject to standard conditions including personal bond and sureties.
What did the court decide?
Applicant released on bail on personal bond with two sureties subject to conditions of appearing in trial and not tampering with witnesses.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10868 of 2018
Applicant :- Pappu @ Vikaruddin Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gajendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Gajendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the applicant was not named in the first information report and his name has come into light during the course of investigation. It is further submitted that the applicant has no concern with the alleged incident. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 15.9.2017. It has been pointed out that the applicant has criminal history which has been duly explained in paragraph no.9 of the affidavit accompanying the bail application.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail despite a criminal history given the circumstances of false implication.
Whether reasonable apprehension of tampering with witnesses warrants the rejection of the bail application.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pappu @ Vikaruddin
Coram
Vivek Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/10868/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court