Shameem and 10 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7528 of…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7528 of 2018
Applicant :- Shameem And 10 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
The applicant through the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with the prayer that the applicant be allowed to furnish fresh bail bonds in newly added Section 325, 308 I.P.C., in Case Crime No. 44A of 2015, under Section 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. as he has not misused the liberty of bail granted to him earlier for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. in the same crime number.
From the perusal of the record it reflects that that the applicants have been allowed bail by the court below on 4.5.2015 thereafter chargesheet was submitted and only section 325 and 308 IPC have been added on which cognizance was taken on 31.8.2017.
The prayer of the applicants for the fresh bail bonds cannot be accepted.
However, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the applicants have not misused their liberty of bail granted to them earlier, I consider it proper to direct the Court below to dispose off the bail application of the applicants for the aforesaid offences, if possible on the same day strictly in accordance with law.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shameem And 10 Others
Coram
Rajul Bhargava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/7528/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court