Court dismissed a group case under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as likely infructuous and for want of prosecution due to non-appearance.
Petition dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution; interim order vacated; liberty granted to move recall application within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7354 of 2006
Applicant :- Sachendra And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Tripathi,A.K. Upadhyaya Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
The case is listed under the heading of "Group of cases U/S 482 Cr.P.C. (likely to be infructuous)".
None appears to press this petition even in revised list.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case cause of action still survives and it has not become infructuous, applicants will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 2.4.2018 Ranjeet Sahu
Sachendra And Others
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
