Rahul and 3 Others v. State of U.P.and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37032 of…
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37032 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 26
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37032 of 2016
Applicant :- Rahul And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shailesh Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that matter was referred to the Mediation Centre vide order dated 5.12.2016. He further submitted that earlier an interim settlement has taken place before Mediation Centre on 26.5.2017 and thereafter final settlement has also taken place on 2.6.2017, copy of interim settlement agreement dated 26.5.2017 along with final settlement agreement dated 2.6.2017 is available on record.
Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that terms and conditions has already been complied with before the Court below and, therefore, suitable direction may be issued to Court below to decide the matter in light of settlement made before the Mediation Centre.
Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the application U/S 482 is disposed with the direction to Principal Judge, Family Court, Etawah to decide the matter preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order in light of final settlement agreement dated 2.6.2017.
Order Date :- 20.11.2018 Junaid
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the pending quo warranto petition should be disposed of in light of the settlement agreement reached before the Mediation Centre.
Whether the State has any objection to the direction to decide the matter based on the final settlement agreement.
Whether the Principal Judge, Family Court, Etawah should be directed to decide the matter within one month.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAHUL AND 3 OTHERS
STATE OF U.P.
NEERAJ TIWARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court