Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging a summoning order was heard. The court found no case for interference and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23429 of 2018
Applicant :- Rambabu And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Sanja Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A. for the State.
This application under section 482 Cr. P. C. has been filed challenging the summoning order dated 04.04.2018 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lalitpur, in Complaint Case No. 5013 of 2016 (Smt. Preeti Vs. Ram Babu and others), under sections 323, 366, 387, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Lalitpur, District Lalitpur.
No case for interference is made out.
It is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 19.7.2018 HSM
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rambabu And 3 Others
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
