This applicant under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought directions to the lower court to conclude the trial of a Section 138 NI Act case expeditiously. The Hon'ble Court directed the court below to do so and disposed of the application.
Directed the court below to conclude the trial of Complaint Case No. 6599 of 2016 expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 54
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19844 of 2018
Applicant :- Anju Tiwari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shweta Srivastava, Alok Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A., for the State.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed with a prayer to direct the court below to decide the trial of the Complaint Case No. 6599 of 2016 (Smt. Anju Tiwari Vs. Rajesh Kumar Shukla) under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Police Station Kalyanpur, District Kanpur Nagar pending before the Special Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 2, Kanpur Nagar.
This matter is of the year 2016.
Consequently, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned court below is directed to conclude the trial of the Complaint Case No. 6599 of 2016 (Smt. Anju Tiwari Vs. Rajesh Kumar Shukla) under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Police Station Kalyanpur in accordance with law, expeditiously.
In view of above, disposed of .
Order Date :- 1.6.2018
Jaswant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the court below to conclude the trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 expeditiously.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Anju Tiwari
State Of U.P.
Umesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
