Disposed

Somnath v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC25 May 2018A482/18591/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings and a non-bailable warrant. The court kept the warrant in abeyance for four weeks, directed the applicant to seek cancellation from the lower court, and may recall the warrant or direct fresh bail.

What did the court decide?

Non-bailable warrant kept in abeyance for four weeks; applicant directed to move an application to cancel the warrant before the court below within three weeks.

Somnath Vs State of U.P. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 49

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18591 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Somnath Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dhiraj Kumar Pandey,Ravi Kant Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State.

¶6

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the entire proceeding as well as non bailable warrant dated 22.03.2018 in Case No. 8643 of 2017, arising out of Case Crime No. 133 of 1994 under Section 420 I.P.C. and Sections 77 and 78 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, Police Station-Kotwali Ngar District- Saharanpur, pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharanpur.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant contends that earlier the applicant had been granted bail by the competent court and thereafter he could not appear before the trial court. Hence non-bailable warrant has been issued against him. He further submits that the reasons on account of which the applicant failed to appear before the trial court were beyond his control and that the applicant has every intention to appear before the court concerned and participate in the trial.

¶8

Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and perused the impugned order as well as the other materials brought on record. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is disposed of with the following direction:

¶9

(i) the applicant shall move an application to cancel the non-bailable warrant issued against him before the court below within three weeks from today along with the certified copy of this order;

¶10

(ii) in that case the concerned court will exercise its discretion to pass appropriate order thereon to either recall the non bailable warrant issued against the applicant or to direct the applicant to file fresh bail bonds within a further period of one week , thereafter;

¶11

(iii) for a period of four weeks from today, non-bailable warrant issued against the applicant shall be kept in abeyance.

¶12

In the event of failure, on part of the applicant to act within time as directed above, the Court below may adopt all coercive measures to ensure his appearance.

¶13

Order Date :- 25.5.2018 Lbm/-

Somnath v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Somnath v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Adwitiya Saha and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Tahreem Alias Chhotey Vs State of U.P. and Another

Son @ Sagun Singh Kushwaha Vs State of U.P. and Another

Simirati Devi Vs Rampher

Smt. Heera @ Meena Vs State of U.P. and Another

Azahar and 5 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Another