Santosh Kumar Mishra v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC held infructuous as the applicant had already surrendered and been enlarged on bail.
Application under Section 482 CrPC held infructuous as the applicant had already surrendered and been enlarged on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15624 of 2018
Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Satya Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Narendra Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Sri Narendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is present.
Sri Sanjay Pal, Advocate holding brief of Sri Satya Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant states that the present application has become infructuous since, the applicant has already surrendered and has been enlarged on bail.
Accordingly, present application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 24.7.2018 Neeraj
Santosh Kumar Mishra
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court