Dismissed
Saeed Hafiz and 3 Others v. State of Up and Another
Allahabad HCA482/15618/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15618 of…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15618 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15618 of 2018
Applicant :- Saeed Hafiz And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of Up And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bashisth Narain Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Service is not reported to be incomplete, though notices were issued on 25.05.2018.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the impugned order dated 16.03.2018 passed by the Addl. Session Judge, Court No. 6, Basti in Session Trial No. 48 of 2017 (State Vs. Sayeed Hafiz and others), under Section 307 I.P.C. and Section 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station- Waterman, District- Basti.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the present application is directed against rejection of the discharge application. It being a session trial and the learned Court below has rejected the discharge application filed by the applicants on the ground that the evidence is yet to be received.
Undeniably, it being a session trial, no other course was open to the learned Court below. It has further noted that the applicants have already been enlarged on bail.
No interference is warranted, at this stage. The present application lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed .
Order Date :- 16.7.2018 Abhilash
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Saeed Hafiz and 3 Others
State Of Up
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court