From perusal of the record, it reveals that after rejection of first application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., on 14.9.2010 presented by Mahesh Chand Saini father of opposite party No. 2 (Mukesh Saini), Mukesh Saini has presented second application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. on the same facts on 10.10.2014 concealing the fact of first application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., presented by his father Mahesh Chand Saini and order passed thereon. Mahesh Chand Saini has not preferred any revision against the rejection order dated 14.9.2010. As such, the order dated 14.9.2010 was the final order. In the order dated 14.9.2010 passed by the Magistrate, it has been observed that the Civil Court in which forged compromise deed has been filed, is competent to take legal course in case, it finds that compromise deed is forged one. Accordingly, second application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., presented by Mukesh Saini before the Magistrate and all proceedings arises therein as a result of that application is grave abuse of the process of the courts. As such, cognizance order passed on the basis that application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., is liable to be set aside.
