The court dismissed an application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous due to lack of response from the applicants' counsel regarding its survival after the efflux of time.
Application dismissed as infructuous due to lack of response from the applicants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12775 of 2006
Applicant :- Ramanand Singh And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Birendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
This matter has been listed in the category of infructuous cases. A notice has also been pasted on the Notice Board requiring the lawyers or their clerks to mark the surviving cases, if at all there are any, and give necessary information in this regard to this Court. Yet no information has been given on behalf of the applicants in any form either to the office or to the Bench Secretary that the matter is still surviving. It appears that by the efflux of time the matter has been rendered infructuous and that is why the same is not being pursued or pressed any more by the party or his counsel.
In the aforesaid circumstances, the application stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 19.7.2018 shiv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramanand Singh And Others
Karuna Nand Bajpayee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
