Dismissed
Mukesh Sharma v. Raj Kumar Upadhyaya
Allahabad HCA227/8823/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8823…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8823…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8823 of 2018
Petitioner :- Mukesh Sharma Respondent :- Raj Kumar Upadhyaya Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Vashisth
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
The prayer made in the present petition is to issue direction to the court below to decide the Original Suit No.320 of 2004 ( Raj Kumar Upadhyaya Vs. Mukesh Sharma & another) within stipulated period.
A Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ali Shad Usmani & others Vs. Ali Isteba & others reported in 2015 (2) ADJ 250 (DB) has held that this Court shall not ordinarily issue direction to the trial court to decide the suit in a time bound manner as it creates additional work in the trial court when oldest suits are pending.
Dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 7.12.2018 Himanshu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an interim stay on the summoning of witnesses is required in the present writ petition.
Mukesh Sharma
Raj Kumar Upadhyaya
Sunita Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court