In this matter under Article 227, the High Court considered a petition challenging an order on valuation. It declined to entertain the challenge due to the suit's pending status in a court of unlimited pecuniary jurisdiction and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed; no further relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 638 of 2018
Petitioner :- Satyendra Singh Respondent :- Rajesh Gaud Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Vikram Yadav
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
By impugned order dated 13.10.2017, issue no.10 relating to valuation has been decided.
This Court is not inclined to entertain the challenge in exercise of power under Article 227 of the Constitution, as admittedly the suit is pending before the court of unlimited pecuniary jurisdiction.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J)
Order Date :- 15.3.2018 SL
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order on valuation in a suit pending before a court of unlimited pecuniary jurisdiction.
Satyendra Singh
Rajesh Gaud
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
