Petition filed under Article 227 was dismissed as infructuous because the FIR had already been registered.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 49
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3896 of 2018
Petitioner :- Sahnawaj And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Saroj Kumar Dubey,Vishwa Nath Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Sri Vishwa Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants states that the present petition has become infructuous, since the FIR has already been registered and as such it may be dismissed.
As prayed, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 19.7.2018 Lbm/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sahnawaj And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And Another
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
