Single judge heard a writ petition in absence of petitioner where impugned order dated 23.3.1999 concerned salary dispute. Court found writ petition without merits dismissed as infructuous.
Petitioner not granted quashing impugned order or directing payment of salary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 40820 of 1999
Petitioner :- Om Prakash Pandey Respondent :- D.I.O.S. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- D.S.P. Singh, Mamta Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.
“ a issue a writ, in the nature and direction of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 23,3,1999.
b issue a command an order in the nature and direction of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the petitioner due salary in accordance with law.”
2 issues framed by the court
Whether writ petition is maintainable in absence of petitioner and answer on merits?
Whether petitioner has made out a case for quashing impugned order?
Om Prakash Pandey
D.I.O.S.
Others
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
