Special appeal dismissed. Bench found no infirmity in the lower court's dismissal of a writ petition challenging erroneous pay scale grant to an untrained Assistant Teacher applicant, noting lack of appointment proof and ineligibility benefits. Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 1658 of 2008
Appellant :- Radhey Shyam Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Anil Bhushan,Adarsh Bhushan,Amit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Trivedi,G.K. Singh,V.K. Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 8.12.2017 IrfanUddin
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant, who was not appointed as Assistant Teacher, is eligible for the pay scale benefits granted to personnel trained in the academic session 1976-77.
Radhey Shyam Sharma
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
